I don't like Clifford, do you?

Quesal

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
743
Reaction score
32
I think Clifford is cool! I'll admit I was a little iffy about him without his sunglases in Muppets Tonight, but I got used to it and then he got his shades back for Muppets from Space and Muppets' Wizard of Oz and it's all good now!
 

minor muppetz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
16,058
Reaction score
2,646
Jim Henson showed weird priorities when introducing new Muppets for the Henson Hour. I kind of rest much of the post Jim path for the Muppets on that decision from the master himself. :smile:

Digit was cool, but he nearly replaced Bunsen (both performed by Goelz, of course). Clifford was a kind of Floyd/Teeth-type for this project while the Mayhem was absent in favor of the emo punks featured in the Hour. Leon was kind of a Gonzo/Scooter hybrid and Bean was the cute small fella that Robin used to be. I enjoyed these new characters, but felt they stepped on the toes of classic Muppets a little too much. Muppets Tonight fell into the same trap.

My point is that Brian Henson did carry on his father's logic. That being said, I disagree with that logic. The Muppets seemed to be experimenting with their formula in a hit-or-miss fashion in Jim Henson's final years.

I agree with that, but judging from what I know about the InnerTube pilot, it seems like Jim Henson initially wasn't too interested in making it a regular follow-up to The Muppet Show. From what I've read, Kermit and Miss Piggy were the only established characters to appear, and they both only made cameos, while the rest of the cast was new (and ironically, with the exception of Digit, didn't become part of the JHH cast). I know that more established characters appeared in the presentation half of the pilot. But judging by what I know about the presentation, Jim Henson wanted the show to be structured like this: StoryTeller week, Lead-Free TV week (which would be like Inner Tube, so why wasn't Inner Tube titled Lead Free TV?), storybook special week,a dn anything-can-happen week. Assuming that Inner Tube/ Lead Free would be a mostly new cast, and assuming that the storybook specials would have featured entirely new characters (though they could have been narrarated by familair characaters like Kermit or Rowlf), I would guess that the anything-can-happen weeks would be where the classic characters would make the most appearances. One show per month (assuming that that week would be a big Muppet special).

Ironically, it seems like originally every JHH epsiode would be one hour-long show (instead of mostly two half-hour shows), and yet the 23-minute pilot was two seperate programs. Maybe that's where Jim Henson or whoever had gotten the idea to make the show like that. But I wonder if it was Jim Henson's own decision to make Kermit, Gonzo, and other classic characters more invovled or if it was a network demand (I know that Jim Henson had full creative controll for TMS, but did he get creative controll voer JHH?).
 

minor muppetz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
16,058
Reaction score
2,646
So, I really can't blame Clifford for taking over the show, so much as being the character that had to carry on the legacy of many characters who just weren't featured regularly. Oz's characters only appeared every so often, and Gonzo, Kermit, and Rizzo were the only regular classic characters to appear in every episode. Even Miss Piggy wasn't around too often. The burden laid with the new puppeteers like Bill Baretta and Leslie Carrara, so naturally, it would wind up focussing more on newer characters.
Jerry Nelson was there, and hardly had any recurring characters. Statler was his only regular classic character on the show. More of Jerry Nelson's characters could have been given regular spots on the show. Robin could have hung out with (or been annoyed by) Andy and Randy. Lew Zealand could have made occassional appearances (and not occassional background appearances plus one speaking cameo. Dr. Strangepork could have been given an expanded role. Since it took place at a TV station Louis Kazagger could have been brought in to host some new Mupet Sports segments. And don't get me started with Floyd (Zippety Zap's lines could have easily been given to Floyd, though I like Zippety better). That could have gotten more classic characters on the show, even if they aren't as well-known.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,718
Reaction score
6,707
Jerry Nelson was there, and hardly had any recurring characters.
As much as I love Jerry, only Robin and Floyd were any of his major TMS characters that were ever included in the core group. Sure, we had some characters that you listed like Kazzagger, Lew Zeland, and Strangepork, but they were going a different route. I think most of the characters could have worked, but all and all, muppets Tonight was the time for the new puppeteers to shine. Other than Gonzo and Rizzo, the screen time was mainly for the new comers. Deep Dish Nine made that abundantly clear. Strangepork would have fit in perfect there. but alas, they wanted a new generation or something like that.
 

frogboy4

Inactive Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
10,080
Reaction score
358
Things like Deep Dish Nine, clever as it was, are why many of the characters from MT and JHH area largely seen as New Coke. I understood the new performers sort of thing, but it was much more forced upon and tolerated by fans rather than connecting with us.

All of the Jim Henson Hour programs still seemed like pilots. Looking back they all have the Sex and Violence Muppet Show-ness, but never transcended it. Muppets Tonight was just beginning to when it shut down. A lot of MT's eventual success on a content (rather than ratings) standpoint was the inclusion of more classic characters in the mix along side Andy & Randy, Clifford and the lot.

I once felt that Jim himself lost the balance and vision of what made the Muppet Show dynamic work. Now I feel that Jim simply lost interest in a dynamic anything like the Muppet Show and was using pieces of it to entice old viewers to new content. I have mixed feelings about that. It did work sometimes, but in its entirety it didn't.

I can't fault the Cliffords for being Cliffords. It is always about how the new Muppets, format and content are brought to fans. The Muppet portions of the Henson Hour actually resepected longtime fans less than the initially Clifford-driven Muppets Tonight. I attribute the beginning of the Muppet brand's troubles to the Hour. (ducks from site) :embarrassed:
 

Baby Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Messages
615
Reaction score
14
I can't fault the Cliffords for being Cliffords. It is always about how the new Muppets, format and content are brought to fans. The Muppet portions of the Henson Hour actually resepected longtime fans less than the initially Clifford-driven Muppets Tonight. I attribute the beginning of the Muppet brand's troubles to the Hour. (ducks from site) :embarrassed:
I agree with that, and though I don't think it worked the same way that the Muppet Show did, I have deep respect for way Jim Henson was always trying to do new things. I don't think he wanted to repeat himself. I think that's admirable, even though it could have arguably been the Muppet brand's downfall.
 

frogboy4

Inactive Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
10,080
Reaction score
358
I agree with that, and though I don't think it worked the same way that the Muppet Show did, I have deep respect for way Jim Henson was always trying to do new things. I don't think he wanted to repeat himself. I think that's admirable, even though it could have arguably been the Muppet brand's downfall.
Exactly. I never thought Muppets Tonight in any of its incarnations would have appealed to Jim because of how the Henson Hour Muppet portions were handled. He'd been there and done that with the Muppet Show and was interested in being much more avant-garde with everything. That, in particular, is what gave the program an unsettling feeling with many viewers and fans. These days the Hour would have gone to Comedy Central, TNT or HBO. They could have focused on fewer shows and out of the box content instead of appealing to network televisions advertising interests Wendy's or Burger King.

Muppets Tonight came around when fans really missed the Muppet Show. I am certain if it had gone on for a full subsequent season that ratings would have reflected that. The Henson Hour, on the other hand, was by nature not an American television network program then or now.

I liked that about it, but I would have rather they aired the Storyteller as its own program, maybe done some InnerTube stuff on MTV or Nick and given fans at least some network Muppet specials in their own right (if not a complete show).

I think Clifford represents the turning point of Muppet confusion when it really should be someone more like (dare I say it) Digit. I love that character, but he's the one in the Henson Hour that took the honored place reserved by Bunsen and Beaker. I feel that's why the character hasn't returned. Writers would rather come up with material for the crowd-pleasing duo than try to sell a largely unknown character.
 

Ilikemuppets

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
15,138
Reaction score
25
Yeah, I do think that in a way that Jim had lost interest. But at the same time, I think that things sort of feel apart around that time with Frank already in another profession after the Muppets had not been in the spot light for a number of years at this point.And it seemed like Jim was trying to move in other directions at this point also. But I also think with the absents of frank who was so key in the Muppets success that he was also trying new things. But I think he had tried to move on to doing new things and movies after the success of the Muppets afforded him to move in new directions creatively. Perhaps he didn't expect the characters to become as big as that had much like sesame street. He expected to move to something new, but they were so in demand. It's like how he did puppets just as a way to get on and into TV. But when you put quality in what you do it usually last. Success can be a good thing and something that can back fire on you at the same time. Jim did wasn't very much to give the people what they wanted from him. I'm thinking that maybe the public was a little more interested in these characters then Jim may have been at the time. It's like Jim said, "As ling as the public like the characters and what to see more of them then they'll stay. and if they don't any more they'll go away." And I think he's fine with it either way, but he didn't seem to concerned if they were to actually go away either. But to move on a try new and different things is probably just an artist thing.
 

minor muppetz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
16,058
Reaction score
2,646
I think Clifford represents the turning point of Muppet confusion when it really should be someone more like (dare I say it) Digit. I love that character, but he's the one in the Henson Hour that took the honored place reserved by Bunsen and Beaker. I feel that's why the character hasn't returned. Writers would rather come up with material for the crowd-pleasing duo than try to sell a largely unknown character.
I think I used to think of him as being similar to Bunsen, but he is also different from them. Bunsen and Beaker are scientists, and Digit was a robot, and a technician. If Dave Goelz didn't perfirn Digit then maybe he could have teamed up with Bunsen and Beaker on occassion, without it seeming like he replaced either.

Now that I think of it, while Solid Foam replaced The Electric Mayhem, did any members seem like direct replacements of the Electric Mayhem members who played their instruments? Digit played the keyboard but as far as I know wasn't the leader (did the band have a specific leader?), and while he has a really cool design, he looks a bit square compared to Dr. Teeth (is there such a thing as a hip square? Or a square hipster? Because I think that could describe Digit). Flash was a singer, while Zoot didn't talk much. The drummer wasn't like Animal, rarely even speaking. I think Clifford is a bit like Floyd when he's not a host, and I feel the same way about Leon (what, did Kevin Clash's contract state that he needed his characters to be like Floyd?), and I guess thatmember would be the most like the Electric Mayhem member of the shame instrument. I'm not too sure of what Beard's personality was like, so I'm not too sure if he can be compared to Janice, personality-wise. He looks very similar to Zeke from the jugband (who looked a lot like Lips from the Electric Mayhem, and Solid Foam didn't have any trumpet players).

But somebody with more access to The Jim Henson Hour will have to confirm that I'm right or wrong. I don't know if the shows production order was the same as it's broadcast order (and I'm mainly referring to the MuppeTelevision segments here... I know that all of The StoryTeller episodes had been completed by then), but the last broadcast episode featured Animal in place of the drummer, and Zoot in place of Flash. I wodner if Jim Henson had decided to get more known characters on the show, and did this in an attempt. We may never know, as there weren't any more episodes (but it would be weird if the band had intended to change that way, because then Dave Goelz would have had two musicians in the same band).
 
Top