CensoredAlso
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2002
- Messages
- 14,028
- Reaction score
- 2,292
One that was designed to shame and silence.Nobody's censoring anybody, that was a comparison being made.
One that was designed to shame and silence.Nobody's censoring anybody, that was a comparison being made.
Once again, you are only outraged if such corruption comes from the GOP. When people get partisan like that, it's not the corruption they're outraged by anymore. It's the mere existence of the other party.Once again, the GOP will support anybody, regardless of how morally corrupt they are, so long as they're not Democrats. Party of values. Kek.
There you go again, putting words into my mouth.One that was designed to shame and silence.
I'll agree that when it comes to the subject of abortion, that's one area where I would actually side with the GOP over that one, as I too am against the termination of an innocent life that hadn't been given the chance to live yet, regardless of the circumstances. However, as I've said, the Democrats tend to be more mindful of all these other issues that affect the American people such as healthcare, the economy, the workforce, middle and working class, human rights, and what have you, whereas the GOP is usually about making sure their own is taken care of, and everybody else fend for themselves (hence the above linked article I shared).The Democrats have also supported perverts, conspiracy theory nutjobs, and extremists that would love to be able to abort Down Syndrome babies and fetuses in general two minutes before birth.
Again, they were quick to give Al Franken - one of their own - the boot on moral grounds. Would the GOP do that? Considering they were in full support of a pedophile, a Holocaust-denier, and now a pimp, they wouldn't if they were also of their own party, but they'd probably be quick to call for their lynching if they're Democrat.There is no difference between the two parties.
The Democrats are mindful of certain human rights. The Republicans are also mindful of certain human rights. And through the years both parties have switched positions when it's convenient, or just to be the opposite of the other party. I believe we do need both, don't get me wrong, despite the problems they both have.However, as I've said, the Democrats tend to be more mindful of all these other issues that affect the American people such as healthcare, the economy, the workforce, middle and working class, human rights, and what have you
They were hoping that would pressure the Republicans to hold Trump accountable. Just as they made Hillary fall on her sword for Obama. Just as they made Bernie fall on his sword for Hillary. In the case of Franken (and with Bernie), such martyrdom was idiotic and didn't work. Also, Franken is an example of how tone deaf metoo was from the start. He is not a Weinstein or Moore.Again, they were quick to give Al Franken - one of their own - the boot on moral grounds.
There are pro life Democrats. They will tell you their party has been hijacked away from them for decades. And the party is still constantly threatening some kind of litmus test to keep pro lifers away, even if it means discrimination against a religion, such as Catholicism.I'll agree that when it comes to the subject of abortion, that's one area where I would actually side with the GOP over that one, as I too am against the termination of an innocent life that hadn't been given the chance to live yet, regardless of the circumstances.
They are mindful of the above things you mentioned. Just because you happen to disagree about their approach or how they wish to achieve it does not mean they are not mindful of it.There you go again, putting words into my mouth.
However, as I've said, the Democrats tend to be more mindful of all these other issues that affect the American people such as healthcare, the economy, the workforce, middle and working class, human rights, and what have you, whereas the GOP is usually about making sure their own is taken care of, and everybody else fend for themselves
They didn't give him the boot on moral grounds. They gave him the boot because it was politically expedient. As CensoredAlso said, they did it to take a shot at the GOP in a failed attempt for them to hold President Trump accountable.Again, they were quick to give Al Franken - one of their own - the boot on moral grounds. Would the GOP do that? Considering they were in full support of a pedophile, a Holocaust-denier, and now a pimp, they wouldn't if they were also of their own party, but they'd probably be quick to call for their lynching if they're Democrat.
Well, he has our former governor beat. Jon Corzine only has one DUI, but also got into an accident and wasn't wearing his seat belt.So I guess Democrats seem to be OK with this
http://www.wisn.com/article/democra...peaker-paul-ryan-arrested-nine-times/22076961
Arrested 9 times including Drunk driving, theft, failure to pay child support. Sounds like a highly moral candidate