That is a valid point, but it will be easier to avoid online, lol.
That depends on the economics of new media. On the one hand, you can pick and choose (to an extent) what you can get. But variety is something that will be controlled by the entertainment industry (Netflix keeps getting titles pulled as a result of wanting more money and exclusive deals), and if they limit what those choices is, it's not much better than television.
Ideally, the internet is where shows that
don't make it should go. But how does that get an audience? How many shows do you only watch because you stumble upon them one day? Arrested Development has a fan base that was willing to follow it online, any new to the internet series would have to rely solely on word of mouth. Also, ideally, it's where older shows
should go, and some do indeed... but under terms and conditions and certain ones never get a legal option.
Plus, there's also the issue of having to buy subscriptions. It doesn't seem too bad to get an 8 dollar a month membership to one site... but then, backroom deals will split your shows among other sites, having to buy more subscriptions from them. It sounds
slightly better than cable, because at least you get to choose channels to purchase... except for the fact you also need to continue to buy internet connectivity. And they stress you buy the biggest, most expensive package to get your shows in HD without choppy outages.
Above all, there's also this... the internet can
go down.