No, of course, not but leave it to Fox News and their masses to say otherwise. "Obummer comin' 4 r gunz! Nobama gonna tak r gunz away! Ovomit be da wurst prezadent evr, y u peeple vot 4 him?"Dems are not coming for the guns. Obama never attempted to remove Second Amendment freedoms.
And you know what else is sad? It got to a point that Obama knew this was going to be the standard response anytime he would address such shootings, so he stopped addressing them altogether because he knew nothing was going to change . . . then those same people turned around and was like, "Obummer's not acknowledging da victims! Nobama dont care about us! Ovomit be da wurst prezadent evr, y u peeple vot 4 him?"
So if he acknowledged the shootings, he was a bad President for trying to take guns away; and if he didn't acknowledge the shootings, he was a bad President for not caring about the victims. They would have said he was a bad President for helping a little old lady cross a street or giving a sandwich to a homeless person.
And that's exactly what Obama was trying to do all along, but it never happened, because . . . heck, I just said why, I don't need to repeat myself.We do, however, need to better apply the laws that are on the books and to devise new ones that will help stem this episodic.
And therein lies the problem: both parties keep accusing the other for politicizing the issue for different reasons. One side accuses the other of politicizing the issue for pushing anti-gun agendas, while the other side accuses the other of politicizing the issue for not politicizing the issue.The time for all parties to talk about this issue is RIGHT NOW!