Censored
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2003
- Messages
- 2,437
- Reaction score
- 557
We did try it. We've had many third parties run. They go nowhere and only empower one of the 2 parties.How would you know if we've never tried?
We did try it. We've had many third parties run. They go nowhere and only empower one of the 2 parties.How would you know if we've never tried?
How? Third parties have always had the right to run. They're just not electable. How do you propose changing it? It's not like there is someone who can flip a switch and make it different. It's the will of the American people.This is what I'm saying. Push the Republicans and Democrats a little further back, and bring the Liberitarians and whatnot a little forward and balance it. Enough with this stupid s***, let's do something that's fair to everyone.
Then there would essentially be one big Government Party with no checks and balances.Even better, scrap parties all together and have single people run.
About time the American people started using their will for better things.How? Third parties have always had the right to run. They're just not electable. How do you propose changing it? It's not like there is someone who can flip a switch and make it different. It's the will of the American people.
It's not the will of the American people. It's a rigged system to keep both current parties in power.How? Third parties have always had the right to run. They're just not electable. How do you propose changing it? It's not like there is someone who can flip a switch and make it different. It's the will of the American people.
How is it rigged? How would one go about changing it?It's not the will of the American people. It's a rigged system to keep both current parties in power.
The only reason Ross Perot had any kind of opportunity is because he is filthy rich and self-funded his own campaign. He is the exception. It is a rigged system because the only people that can afford to run are the filthy rich, both Democrats and Republicans. Google the salaries and wealth of U.S. politicians. Then add in to that the lobbyist's and their contributions to these same rich people's campaigns. Sorry to break it to you but it's a pay for play system. We need very serious campaign financing reform. And we need term limits so the politicians are more loyal to their constituents than they are to their campaign donors and special interest funds.How is it rigged? How would one go about changing it?
Third parties have always been around and are free to run if they want to. The reason some people like Third Parties is because they make a lot of pie in the sky, unrealistic promises, as well they can afford to. They know they can't be elected, so they're not afraid of promising more than they or any other politician could deliver.
One Third Party candidate who had every opportunity was Ross Perot during the Clinton/Bush Sr. election. He got to participate in every debate, was counted as a legitimate candidate in every news report, and it was clearly a 3 person race. There were people who liked Perot, there were people who disliked both Clinton and Bush, but at the end of the day, Perot still got the lowest percentage of votes. It's not the system. It's the will of the majority.