1. Welcome to the Muppet Central Forum!
    You are viewing our forum as a guest. Join our free community to post topics and start private conversations. Please contact us if you need help with registration or your account login.

  2. Sesame Street Season 48
    Sesame Street's 48th season officially began Monday August 6 on PBS. After you see the new episodes, post here and let us know your thoughts.

    Dismiss Notice

Why did MFS and EIG bomb so bad?

Discussion in 'Classic Muppets' started by BobThePizzaBoy, Jul 16, 2009.

  1. Drtooth

    Drtooth Well-Known Member

    Can I just pipe in to say that it usually doesn't matter about the quality of a film, and good films can tank while terrible ones become hits? Look at Transformers 2.... really... I don't wanna watch that one, I heard nothing but outlandishly bad things. And that one did pretty good for itself, right? I even remember hearing about last year's European film Asterix at the Olympics was a massive success, and it earned the European equivalent of the Razzie...

    I think that Robin Hood doesn't (understandably) get a lot of love... and frankly, I could see the movie version having Some B-List actor as Robin Hood and one as Prince John, and just having the Muppets play smaller roles... like the Merry men or something. I really hope that someone would consider making a Muppet Movie sort of like that, and the humans would be the guest stars or the villains or something.
  2. Fozzie Bear

    Fozzie Bear Well-Known Member

    A truly timeless cameo would need to be folks who don't show up in People, US, Entertainment Weekly, Weekly World News or Enquirer. Pop Culture references will only put a time-line on a film. If you look at how The Muppet Movie was done, even Great Muppet Caper, you'll see how good cameos work.

    (This is related to a thread above).

    FTB worked superbly with the mix of all the characters and people as opposed to EIG, which sorely missed the mix of all people and characters. As a matter of fact, anything with Elmo in it will usually nix the use of the SS people and other characters.
  3. Drtooth

    Drtooth Well-Known Member

    We already had this thread, and this was an old one at that.

    MFS, the studio didn't care, the director wasn't a fan, and everything just suffered from there. I actually liked MFS, but the hack director held everything Muppety back because, well, he had no idea what he's doing and he really wanted to become the most mediocre kiddy film director of all time.

    Now, I'd challenge that Elmo movie for teenagers theory. A LOT of teens wear T-Shirts of characters they have little or no interest in because it's hot to wear them at the time. Look at the girly Tweety Bird shirts they wore in the 90's... Tweety isn't EVEN a girl, and any Looney Tunes fan knows that. Also, we tend to look past his cuteness to see his extreme survival instincts, bordering on diabolic.

    The problem with EIG WAS that it was a no-miss concept that completely failed. The audience and demographic was one that shouldn't be taken to see movies in the first place... 3 year olds! The problem is, much like He-Man and the like, the toy was incredibly popular that the movie sounded like a no-brainer... but then again, they screw up the movie.

    Now, substance wise, the reason the movie doesn't work is the same reason Elmo's World doesn't work. He spends most of the movie alone talking to the audience. Now, had Oscar or ANY of the other Grouches besides the bug went along with him, and he spent the movie interacting with an actual character, rather than the audience, the film would have had a better flow. I liked that they explored his character early and late in the film (something the show refuses to do :rolleyes: ) but in the middle, he basically turned the movie into a mock interactive film, and kept asking the audience for help. Now... I know that most of the Muppet movies have a "No fourth wall at all" policy and Kermit and everyone talks to the audience the whole time... but unlike EIG, they just make comments and asides on the action ("I wish I were you in the audience watching this for the first time").

    When Maria, Gordon, Big Bird and Telly went to rescue him, they spent most of the movie in Grouchland jail... a cute concept, but again, Elmo spent most of the movie alone. Unlike FTB, where Big Bird, while on the run, kept in constant contact with everyone in the scene... and we switched off with the other characters a bit more.

    Probably should have been a DTV project. I guess it may have done better on DVD.
  4. Drtooth

    Drtooth Well-Known Member

    Elmo's great when he plays off other characters.

    Elmo's grating when he stands there, devoid of character, and tells kids to count flash animations on the screen.

    A little more former and a lot less latter, and the film would have worked better. Conceptually, it should have been good. Actually, I liken it to what I said about MFS, where it had a big opening and everything turned into DTV quality after that... only it seems that came a little further into the movie in EIG... more like Elmo in Baron nothing land at one point.
  5. frogboy4

    frogboy4 Inactive Member

    "Elmo in Grouchland" tanked at the Box Office simply because it was a bad movie. It was uneven from beginning to end and the otherwise good actors were encouraged to pull faces and ham-it-up rather than play it like they would on the real Sesame Street program.

    Elmo In Grouchland cost $26 million to make yet took in $11.5 million domestically. That's $18.5 million in today's dollars. It debut at number 9 and took in less than $4 million it's opening weekend. It should have at least been a modest hit. Elmo had no clear competition. "Drive Me Crazy", "Mystery, Alaska" and "Three Kings" were not biting at the same Elmo apple here.

    There was no shortage of advertising. The fuzzy red creature made the talk show rounds and ads were clearly everywhere. They were riding the success of the Tickle Me Elmo doll and all seemed bright. Producers needed to give young adults more to connect with and that was sorely missing.

    They kind of forgot that once people see Elmo you've got to offer them more. Sesame is an ensemble cast and little of it was seen here. It marked a time when the producers allowed Elmo's popularity to eclipse everything else that made Sesame a success. They also forgot that kids see this stuff piped into their homes for free. They don't care about a bigger budget.

    There's no one clear reason why Elmo fared so poorly. It's really all of them. The film was bungled from the start and I was particularly annoyed that there was very little Oscar in Grouchland at all! Pairing those two characters up more often could have been comedy gold. However, the one stand-alone funny moment was Dave Goelz' giant chicken. That was funny!
  6. Drtooth

    Drtooth Well-Known Member

    Exactly what I was saying. Conceptually, a movie based on something THAT popular should do well, even if the movie wasn't all that good to begin with. But then again, when they made that abomination of an American Idol movie, no one wanted to see that either.

    Overall, I still feel the root problem IS that somewhere, somehow, they feel Elmo needs to be isolated from the rest of the series and have alone time with celebs or something. That's why classic fans disliked SS... not so much Elmo or his presence, the way he's used.

    plus, a movie for 3 year olds? BAAAAAAAD idea. At least FTB tried to make itself an all ages movie. But that's back when SS was for kids 3-6.
  7. Daffney

    Daffney Active Member

    I believe Columbia's the culprit to blame.

    I remember watching a preview on one Columbia-TriStar VHS from late 1998, which gave teasers for both Muppets from Space and Elmo in Grouchland. From there, I suspected that the studio was wanting these two films to be big hits, but that didn't happen.

    In MFS case, not only was that film hastily rushed to meet a summer release date, which at that time was not a wise choice, but it also had less advertising for it. Even those ads had no idea how to promote such a film like that. In fact, if you saw the trailer, you will noticed that it seemed lost and was struggling to make it spaced themed.

    For EIG, it had a higher ad campaign, but those ads suffered from the same MFS issue. The film had to face competition by the more mature films at that time and it may have been seen by many as a "little kiddie" film.

    The blame should be placed on Columbia. The trilogy of flops JHP released with them might have been the reason why the division was short-lived.
  8. Drtooth

    Drtooth Well-Known Member

    That's because it was, and it's because SS's demographic changed dramatically. They made the film to speak specifically to Elmo fans, and added too much Elmo's world to the picture. Even if the movie were done well, the fact that it caters to a group of very young kids who can't sit still for a 90 minute film. It didn't have that family film vibe FTB had... but then again, FTB was made when kids as old as 6 watched the show.

    Then again, I'm wondering if the other factor comes into play... The American public adamantly refuses to watch something on the big screen they can see at home. Sure, crappy remakes of TV shows they want, but not the original TV shows themselves during the run of the show. I've said this a million times now, but Japan has theatrical releases of its cartoon shows (and I think sentai hero shows) all the time... of course, sometimes in double or triple bills.. but there's 17 Dragonball movies (4 Dragonball, 13 DBZ), and Doraemon gets an annual film. Here, cartoon movies are hit or miss... Simpsons, South Park, Spongebob, and Rugrats did well... PPG, Hey Arnold, and countless others not so much. And Rugrats was the only time we've seen multiple films. Same with regular TV shows as movies... they tend to do only so so. The first Sex and the City did alright, second didn't. I remember both X-Files movies not going so well, the 1966 Batman film was basically for foreign markets, but thank frog they made it... it's the only 60's Bats we'll ever see on DVD. Star Trek was the only thing to break into the film franchise market.

    And even if they do get made, they have to offer something special to keep from being a 90 minute episode of the show. Somehow, I could see the SAME plot used in an episode or 2 of SS, broken up by letters and numbers and stuff... FTB could have as well, but it managed to grow with the big screen.

    Maybe if EIG was filmed on location and didn't look so dead...
  9. minor muppetz

    minor muppetz Well-Known Member

    A number of people said that EIG was promoted better than MFS... But I remember it being the other way around. While I didn't see commercials for either movie often, I recall seeing MFS commercials just a little more than EIG commercials. I saw the EIG trailer in theaters, but not the MFS trailer, but I also saw previews (both the teaser and the theatrical trailer) on a number of Jim Henson Home Entertainment VHS releases, but with the exception of some DVDs the same can't be said for EIG (though I saw a commercial for the movie on the Stuart Little VHS).

    Speaking of promos on video, I found this promo on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cN71Cr6VGg It advertised both movies back-to-back, but for some reason the Muppets From Space one didn't show any clips from the movie, just a shot of a planet and the title logo. Would that count as a teaser trailer?

    It's a shame more movies didn't get more merchandise, though Elmo in Grouchland was one of the few Henson movies to get a video game tie-in (Labyrinth being the other). It would have been cool if they made a deal to release a Muppets From Space action figure or PVC collection; It could have featured Kermit, Gonzo, Fozzie, Pepe, Rizzo, Animal, Pepe, and Bobo (maybe also Bunsen, Beaker, Dr. Phil van Neuter, Ubergonzo, alien gonzos, and Clifford). I know that Zowie planned on relasing a playset for the movie, featuring figures of Kermit, Gonzo, and Rizzo plus Muppet Labs, Covnet, the boarding house, and a spaceship, but that didn't get past the production stages.

    When Space Jam came out there was a collection of Looney Tunes VHS releases called "The Stars of Space Jam". A few years ago I thought it would have been cool if MFS and EIG got similar video treatment. Basically, each volume would focus on a main character, with new footage of the character being interviewed, a clip or two from the movie, and clips from past productions. Of course at the time the only Pepe footage out there was from Muppets Tonight and the Muppetisms.

    I pointed this out in the other thread relating to the box office failure of MFS, but I think I should point it out here as well. I noticed a little similarity in the two movies. In MFS, when Miss Piggy finds out that Gonzo was being taken to a government building, she told her friends at the boarding house, and pretty much everybody who was there at the time got together to go rescue Gonzo. In EIG, when Oscar finds out Elmo is going to Grouchland, he tells Telly, who panics and tells everyone who was on the street at the time, before Oscar confirms it, and then almost everyone present at the time got together to rescue Elmo (though in Elmo's case they only knew of him going after his blanket, not knowing of any certain trouble Elmo was in; Oscar had no idea he was headed towards Huxley's castle until closer to the end). And in both movies only a small number of characters went searching. I think it was drtooth who said they should have split the groups up, and I agree (and feel more characters should have been involved as well). Drtooth stated in the other thread how it felt odd having three Frank Oz characters in that group, and to me in the case of EIG it seems the inclusion Cookie Monster in the main group was a bit pointless. I wonder if Oz looped most of his characters dialogue in that one as well.
  10. Drtooth

    Drtooth Well-Known Member

    I saw that one too... and it's CLEARLY evident that there were some down to the wire production problems for MFS for EIG to have at least an entire scene finished a year in advance for a trailer (unless EIG was rushed out and completed first). Granted, the Muppets 2011 didn't start filming until less than a year before the film was scheduled to come out, but it didn't have production problems (we can thank the symbiotic relationship between the director and writers for that one), and I'd say the script approval stage would hardly make the project rushed...

    Though, the least we could have had with this upcoming film was a teaser that had nothing to do with the plot, much like MFS did. Just an announcement.

    Merchandise does not a successful movie make. I've seen several movies that actually got more merchandise the second film around (Madagascar for example). I've seen dozens of movies with shelves of merchandise that could NEVER EVER be cleared out no matter how low they put the price, both movies that did respectably well and movies that flopped completely. I remember the Disney Store had to clear out Treasure Planet stuff at deep discounts and there were no takers. Some companies are overly cautious, some companies are far too sure of themselves.

    And really, in a summer dominated by Star Wars and to a lesser extent Tarzan merchandise (soon to make way for Toy Story 2 stuff), there was probably hardly any room or call for MFS toys... (besides... I wish Disney merchandised Inspector Gadget a little more... though I do have all 3 bean bags, the complete Mathew Broaderick looking McD's toy, and the 2 push pops) did any of the other movies have anything? Other than MTI and MCC, I haven't seen much movie related merchandise... maybe the GMC McD's glasses and posters and the MTM Marvel comics adaption and book and record and the beginnings of Muppet Babies merchandise... other than soundtracks, of course... and Palisades figures. But back then, they just had regular Muppet stuff, right?

    I just hope we get a lot of great regular Muppet stuff by the time this new movie rolls around.
  11. GonzoLeaper

    GonzoLeaper Well-Known Member

    I liked both "Muppets From Space" and "The Adventures of Elmo in Grouchland". But I will say "Follow That Bird" is still my favorite of the two Sesame Street movies- probably because I grew up with that one. But on the other hand, I was pleasantly surprised with "The Adventures of Elmo in Grouchland" when I finally saw it because it wasn't nearly as bad or necessarily Elmo-centric as I thought it might have been. I loved Ernie and Bert's interjections and it was neat to see such an exploration of the inside of Oscar the Grouch's trash can and the world of Grouchland. It kind of makes you wonder why he chooses to live on Sesame Street rather than join the rest of the grouches in Grouchland. Is he an ambassador for them? Or does he just like to be grouchy and make everything miserable for the rest of the Sesame Street denizens? Or could it be- somewhere way deep down- Oscar really does like and love the Sesame Street gang- and they are his family, whether he admits it or not.:grouchy::wisdom::)
    But "Muppets From Space" was great too- I saw that in theaters and loved it. I particularly enjoyed the musical numbers- "Brickhouse" and "Celebration"- two great funky songs from the late '70s and early '80s. It so happened that those two are some of my favorite songs and it was fun to see the Muppets singing them. It would have been nice to have some original songs (like I really would have loved to have Gonzo do his reprisal of "I'm Going to Go Back There Someday" like was released on CD) but I really loved the Noah's Ark scene- that was very fitting. And I love that Gonzo found his alien family but even after finding them finally and realizing the thing he'd been longing for for so long- he came to realize that he had already found belonging and acceptance and a family- with the Muppets. That was a great lesson in itself- something that Sesame Street also teaches quite well. I like that.
  12. Muppet Master

    Muppet Master Well-Known Member

    MFS flopped for a few reasons. First, it got mixed reviews, well let me clear that up, its R.T. rating currently is 63% which is a fresh rating (barely), but a lot of the fresh reviews come from 1/1/2000, so at the time the film was actually in theaters it had probably a rotten rating of 40-50%, not good, which drove audiences away. Next, the adverstising was low, all they had was Kermit and Gonzo on the wheel and Andie Macdowell on Late Night, not good. Finally, it faced Tarzan which was highly successful and better critical wise, I mean it also appealed to kids more, I mean I remember someone commenting on Youtube that when they saw Gonzo being struck by lightening in the theater as a kid they went to Tarzan instead, so ya MFS got pummeled, but continues to thrive on store shelves, considering that MFS along with MTM are usually the only muppet movies at Walmart or Target both in the $5 bin, so I could imagine a family buying it for a family movie night, and clearly enjoying it. EIG was a whole different story. That film first was plain bad. Then, it was basically a 17 min. longer episode of SS or an extended Elmo's World segment. Why would parents waste their hard earned money on a film when their child could watch it on their TV like three times a day, and considering the target audience of the film it would make no difference for your 3-year old to laugh when they see Elmo on TV for free than when they go to the big screen and watch it, I could almost imagine a parent wasting $20 worth of popcorn and tickets for their 3-year old to lose their patience before the traliers start, start crying and throwing popcorn everwhere, wow that parent just threw their $20 in the trash. Split issues, but at least both films made a decent profit on the home market, but I can see why after EIG why an SS movie was out of the question.
  13. Muppet Master

    Muppet Master Well-Known Member

    That's what The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made was supposed to be somewhat like.
  14. WalterFan1234

    WalterFan1234 Well-Known Member

    MFS bombed because it lacked feeling and musical numbers.

    I liked EIG personally, but it isn't everyone's cup of tea so that may have messed it up. Also the fact that seeing Sesame Street in theaters is weird when you could watch it on tv. I would still see the movies in theaters though.
  15. Mr Sweetums

    Mr Sweetums Well-Known Member

    I recently saw MFS again and the more I see it the more I realise I actually enjoy it very much. This movie did a very good job and reaching out to non-Muppet fans (my non-Muppet fan friends love this one (and MTI)) and to Muppet fans bringing us the Muppets playing themselves again and slowly reintroducing Rowlf, Scooter and many other "forgotten" Muppets.

    Sadly what I think left everybody down was the fact that the Muppets did not go to space, I know it's called Muppets From Space but still you don't advertise a space movie and then only spend two minutes of the film in space having Gonzo talking with Cosmic Fish. I imagine that lots of people might have enjoyed the movie whist watching it the first time around but waiting for them to go to Space and never actually going there in the end probably ruined the experience for them.

    As a Muppet Fan the lack of Musical Numbers was very disappointing, the fact that Gonzo was an Alien didn't really interest me but what I think disappointed most people (fans and non-fans) was the fact that the Muppets didn't go to Space.

    on a personal note I hate that Clifford doesn't travel with the gang to save Gonzo, he was in so much of the movie, he deserved to be there.
    Muppet Master and WalterFan1234 like this.
  16. WalterFan1234

    WalterFan1234 Well-Known Member

    I agree with the fact that the muppets not going to space makes it disappointing. They could've done so many cool things with the movie, but they just decided to make gonzo an alien.

    The lack of musical numbers is absolutely terrible, because of a lot of the best muppet moments are them singing.

    I always thought gonzo was a turkey because of his chicken obsession, but the fact that he is an alien was disappointing.
  17. Muppet Master

    Muppet Master Well-Known Member

    After watching the film for the first time May 2013, yes that did let me down, I mean I was really looking forward to some space action scenes. After I watched it more times it didn't bother me at all, but that one first time I saw it, I was crestfallen. I don't know why more people don't bring this up, all I hear is how there was no music, but what about going into space? When the VHS/DVD/Blu-Ray cover of a film has the characters IN SPACE IN A SPACESHIP and the START MENU HAS THE MAIN CHARACTER BEING SUCKED BY A SPACESHIP then I think the characters should at least go to space, besides as part of the opening credits or a hallucination sequence, it's very misleading, but it just goes to show you, you can't judge the film by the VHS/DVD/Blu-Ray cover. For the record, when I watched the trailer a billion times in anticipation of watching the film, I thought when the aliens sang celebration that they were in space!
  18. LouisTheOtter

    LouisTheOtter Well-Known Member

    Mrs. Otter and I saw Elmo in Grouchland for the first time last night so I figured I'd chip in with a few thoughts.

    While the script and overall production were clearly mining the Elmo's World vibe and aiming for a much younger audience (which, as has been mentioned before, isn't going to sit still for a 90-minute theatrical movie), we actually enjoyed a lot of the film as adults.

    Ernie and Bert's interruptions were hilarious (especially the "movie audiences don't like sad endings" bit near the end), Mandy Patinkin made a great villain (that "Mine" song at the midway point is one of my new favourite examples of a Muppet guest star knowing exactly what he signed up to do and relishing every second of it), and it was fun seeing a lot of our favourite characters mixed in with new faces. Did anything ever happen to those Muppet bugs that were Huxley's henchmen? They could have worked well in future appearances on Sesame Street IMO.

    I'll echo previous comments about Elmo being rather grating in large doses, and overall EIG just felt like an underdeveloped project. So many SS characters - humans and Muppets - seemed thrown into the mix with little real purpose (Cookie Monster's role in the search party seemed overly altruistic for his character) and many times I felt the script could have used a little punching up.

    Not a bad effort, though. I get what they were trying to do. But it would probably have worked better as a direct-to-video production.
  19. Oscarfan

    Oscarfan Well-Known Member

  20. Drtooth

    Drtooth Well-Known Member

    Preschool character based movies never tend to do well, for obvious reasons... kids the film appeals to would be too young for a proper movie going experience, and the fact that the parents probably wouldn't want to sit for 90 minutes watching said characters or keeping their kids in check. Like I said, I've had miserable times at theaters when under 5 year olds are taken. FTB didn't exactly do much business until it hit home video, either.

    I'll agree. The film seems like it was almost done and of home video quality (saw it on home video though). It really should have had more. We got some great Elmo character development (something absent from EW, and a good deal of appearances on the show proper), some nice sly humor... but they tried to make it the same faux interactivity that EW has, Elmo spends too much of the movie alone with no one to talk much too, and the B story with the other Sesame Street characters ends too fast and gets no development. But then again, if quality equaled Box Office draw, Scott Pilgrim would have been a smash hit, and there wouldn't be 4 Transformer movies.

Share This Page