EXACTLY!!!
They have money to spare, we don't, so why should we get taxed out the wazoo, while they get breaks? What sense does that make? Let's Sesame this for a moment:
Ernie and Bert are having lunch in Hooper's Store. Ernie has ten apples, and Bert has four apples. Alan says there's not enough apples in Hooper's Store and has to take some back in order to have enough apples in Hooper's Store. Alan decided that he needs to take apples away from Bert, and takes all of Bert's apples, leaving him with none. Ernie, on the other hand, is given the option of giving apples, but doesn't have to, so Ernie gives one of his apples to Alan, but expects apples in return, so Alan gives Ernie two of Bert's apples for one of his apples.
Doesn't seem right, does it?