Oh yes I DID PREDICT RIGHT, Luke. You can't have your "cake and eat it too." All you guys tell me to lay off because the Henson kids deserve a life of their own. Well that is FINE with me. I always said it is THEIR building and THEIR company, so what is to argue? I agree with the fundamentel right of the kids. I said back then that the sale of the building was not needed, and you all said "they need money from it to make a movie" and so WHERE IS THE MOVIE? HA HA! NEVER will there be a MUPPET movie from the Henson kids so I was RIGHT! I guessed that the sale of the building was chump change compared to the fortunes of multimillionaires, and I said back then that it means bad things coming and that the kids want nothing to do with puppets and stuff. They want to wash their hands of the glory days and leave, and I was RIGHT. WHY else would the kids keep the Henson name and at the same time get rid of Kermit...the MOST FAMOUS puppet in all ther world??? They want to be in show business, but they want NOTHING of puppets, and their DAD was Muppets, not FARSCAPE and that alien dog movie. The kids wash their hands and go to do other things in show business and NOT PUPPETS. Am I wrong? "The Henson's are gonna be making the Muppet shows and movies for at least another three years. You say they might suffer creatively but then why hire the Henson Company as consultants for further years if Disney don't care about the qualtiy?" Wow. 3 years. Whoopee. That's just there for the transition. It has no future. It takes that long to make a movie sometimes. That favours Disney to make it easy going at the changing over. As for consultants, it doesn't amount to anything. That's like Gene Roddenberry hanging around as a consultant. Nobody has to pay attention to him. Star Trek quality went bad, too. The owners do what they want. Disney does not care about quality first. They care about money first. Maybe you like Mighty Ducks and Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen and Lion King 1.5, but they are NOT quality to me. Pixar is the good stuff. DIsney USED to be quality, but they are CRAP now. Wait a minute, maybe you don't like them movies either. I don't mean to offend, I am just making my point, too. Crappy DIsney owns the Muppets. Why should I be happy? Okay, Brian never wanted to be his Dad. That is obvious, and the kids made dumb deals, had bad luck, and made some crap, too. Now the Muppets are looked at like a "retro" thing for the old-timers like you and me. So now Disney gets them and will probably make good money, but it will be kiddie crap time. WHY is it wrong to be upset? People have different views sometimes. "If Brian Henson hated puppets THAT much then why would they have Rygel in his pet project, Farscape? The Henson Company have definitely NOT got out of puppetry. If anything, the Disney deal means there will be MORE puppetry for them to work on." I don't mean to sound bad, but I say "so what" to one or two puppet characters in a normal show. If somebody just sold the Muppets, I would certainly say that they have just got OUT of puppetry in a big-time style. And I say "if anything," the Disney deal means there will be more puppet projects for DISNEY to work on, not Henson. I will take that back after we get the new "Henson" logo and IF it has any puppet character on it. Henson company is now just another company that will do anything, and might build you a monster for a fantasy movie if you want one. Just a hired hand. You say I need a "little more knowlege." Well, we are all in the dark unless I see your name on a Henson production. So I think we are all equals around here. I predict the next Disney Muppet thing will stink, and the new Henson company logo will have NO puppets on it. MARK my words, for I am MARK.